Cervical Radiculopathy and Myelopathy

Both the spinal cord itself and the exiting nerve roots are subject to compression in the cervical spine. Compression neuropathy of the nerve roots is termed radiculopathy; pressure on the cord can produce myelopathy.

Radiculopathy can be caused by chronic overgrowth of the bone and soft tissue or acute disc herniation. Cervical radiculopathy presents as unilateral arm pain, paresthesias, or weakness in the areas innervated by the compressed nerve.

Myelopathy is usually caused by degenerative cervical spondylosis. Myelopathy presents in older patients as bilateral paresthesias, loss of dexterity, and impaired gait. Myelopathy can also be acute due to a large central disc herniation that compresses the spinal cord. Traumatic injuries to the cervical spine that result in bony or soft tissue compression of the cervical spinal cord can also cause myelopathy.

Structure and Function

The spinal cord exits the cranium through the foramen magnum to enter the spinal canal. In the cervical spine, branches off the cord form the cervical nerve roots and exit through their neural foramina. The remaining cord passes to the thoracic and lumbar regions.

The cervical canal is normally about 17 mm in diameter, but varies by individual. Thus, the amount of space for the neural elements is best considered in relative terms: the ratio of the sagittal diameter of the canal to the corresponding measurement of the vertebral body. This is known as the Torg-Pavlov ratio and is usually equal to 1 (Figure 1).

Figure 1: To calculate the Torg-Pavlov ratio, the sagittal diameter of the spinal canal (A) is measured from the posterior surface of the vertebral body to the nearest point of the corresponding spinal laminar line. The sagittal diameter of the vertebral body (B) is measured at the midpoint between the anterior surface and the posterior surface. The Torg-Pavlov ratio is A/B. (The drawing and radiograph are modified from Clin Orthop Surg. 2009 Mar; 1(1) via creative commons license.)

The spinal cord takes up an increasing fraction of the spinal canal moving distally: the cord takes about 50% of the space at C1, but about 75% at C6. Narrowing of the canal, or stenosis, can lead to compression of the spinal cord and symptoms of myelopathy.

The most common cause of cervical stenosis and resulting myelopathy is age-related degenerative change. Degenerative change includes protrusion of the discs, hypertrophy of the ligaments and osseous overgrowth. Degenerative change can also produce a slippage of one vertebral body over the other (spondylolisthesis) which can compress the cord as well. Degenerative changes are most frequently seen at C5, C6 and C7.

Congenital stenosis is also possible, although much less common. Rheumatoid arthritis, producing both synovial overgrowth as well as slippage from facet arthritis, might also reduce the amount of space available for the spinal cord.

At each cervical level, dorsal (sensory) and ventral (motor) neurons combine to form nerve roots. These roots exit the spine through the lateral neural foramen. It is important to keep in mind, that in the cervical spine, each named nerve root exits above the corresponding vertebral pedicle, that is, the C6 nerve root exits between C5 and C6 (Figure 2) whereas in the thoracic and lumbar spine, the nerve roots exit below the corresponding pedicle (i.e. the L2 nerve root exits between L2 and L3). The C8 nerve root exits between C7 and T1 to allow for this transition.

Figure 2: The cervical nerve roots are shown and labeled in blue, and the vertebral bodies are shown and labeled in brown. As noted, the C-6 root exits above the C6 vertebral body.

The cervical nerve roots travel from the cord in a horizontal orientation, whereas lumbar nerve roots travel distally with vertical orientation before moving laterally. Thus, in the cervical spine, both centrally-located and peripheral masses will compress the same nerve root. By contrast, in the lumbar spine, a lateral or foraminal mass will compress the nerve root on the verge of exit, whereas a central or paracentral disc herniation will compress the nerve root that is traveling distally to exit one level lower (the traversing nerve root).

The distinctions between cervical and lumbar nerve herniations based on central vs lateral location is demonstrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3: The cervical nerve roots, left panel, diverge from the spinal cord horizontally, such that a central disc herniation (shown as a red circle) and a lateral disc herniation (black circle) compress the same nerve root: i.e., a C 5/6 disc herniation compresses the C6 root, as shown, independent of how lateral the disc herniation might be. On the other hand, in the lumbar spine (shown at right) the nerve root travels distally in a vertical orientation close to the cord for approximately one vertebral level. Thus, a central disc herniation of the L 4/5 disc (shown in red) will compress the traversing L5 nerve root that is still central (the L5 root is shown in purple, terminating at the red star), yet a lateral disc herniation at this level (black circle) will compress the exiting L4 root (shown in green, terminating at the black star).

Patient Presentation

Cervical spine stenosis is often asymptomatic. Also, myelopathy and radiculopathy are not exclusive: a combined condition termed myeloradiculopathy due to age-related degenerative changes can be present. The entire clinical picture–history, physical, and diagnostic imaging–must be considered.

Myelopathy first presents with neck pain or stiffness. There is extremity numbness and tingling in a non-dermatomal distribution, usually bilaterally, affecting first the upper and then the lower extremities. There is motor weakness, difficulty with fine motor function, and decreased coordination; there may be gait instability and urinary incontinence with more progressive compression.

The neurologic exam will reveal weakness (though this can be subtle) and decreased ability for rapid, repetitive movements. Abnormal proprioception (as seen on the “finger to nose with eyes closed” test) may be present. Additional findings include hyperreflexia and impaired heel-toe walking.

Cord compression may be suggested by two special signs: the Hoffmann sign and the Babinski reflex. The Hoffman sign (Figure 4) is noted when there is involuntary flexion or adduction of the thumb when the examiner flicks the fingernail of the middle finger down. Babinski’s sign (Figure 5) is seen when the great toe extends involuntarily in response to the examiner’s scratching the outer underside of the patient’s foot. The normal response is for the toes to curl downwards. (Babinski’s sign is also present in normal babies under the age of 2 months.)

Figure 4: Hoffman sign is seen when the thumb involuntarily adducts or flexes in response to the examiner’s flicking of the middle finger.
Figure 5: Babinski’s sign is observed when the great toe extends involuntarily in response to the examiner’s scratching the outer underside of the patient’s foot.

Radiculopathy may also present with neck pain or stiffness, but the characteristic finding is pain and paresthesias in a dermatomal distribution in the arm (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Dermatomes of the upper extremity. (Modified from http://www.cmej.org.za/index.php/cmej/article/view/2708/2829)

There may also be weakness and abnormal reflexes, as follows:

  • C5: Deltoid and biceps weakness. Decreased biceps reflex.
  • C6: Brachioradialis and wrist extension weakness. Decreased brachioradialis reflex..
  • C7: Triceps and wrist flexion weakness. Decreased triceps reflex.
  • C8: Intrinsic hand muscle weakness. .

Objective Evidence

In evaluating patients for cervical stenosis, myelopathy or radiculopathy, radiographic images are crucial, starting with a cervical x-ray series (lateral, AP, oblique, and flexion/extension views are commonly used). Cervical stenosis can be categorized as “absolute stenosis” when the spinal canal diameter measures less than 10mm, or as “relative stenosis” when the diameter is 10 to 13mm. Stenosis is also suggested with a Torg-Pavlov ratio <0.8.

Cervical x-rays (Figure 7) may show significant degenerative changes such as osteophytes, disc space narrowing or facet joint hypertrophy.

Figure 7: lateral radiograph showing spondylosis (degenerative disc space narrowing and osteophytic spurring) in the cervical spine. On flexion, there is an anterolisthesis of C4 with respect to C5 secondary to degenerative facet joints; this likely contributes to canal stenosis at C4/5. (Case and caption courtesy of Dr Yi-Jin Kuok, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 18348)

CT without contrast can provide information on the cervical vertebrae and cervical stenosis, but the limited soft tissue information reduces its utility. CT myelography can be used to visualize the space around the neural elements in patients with contraindications to MRI. In this test, a contrast medium is injected into the intradural space. Because this is an invasive test, it should be employed with proper prudence.

MRI is the study of choice for evaluating spinal cord or root compression (Figure 8). However, false positive findings are common. (Note that many asymptomatic people greater than 40 years of age will have some MRI abnormality). Findings must be evaluated in the context of appropriate presentation, and thus MRI should not be used as a screening test but to answer a specific clinical question.

Figure 8: MRI showing cervical canal stenosis worse at C3/4 due to posterior osteophyte disc complex. There is associated spinal cord edema corresponding to myelopathy. (Case courtesy of Dr Yi-Jin Kuok, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 18348)

Electromyogram and nerve conduction studies can be used to localize peripheral nerve damage, however these studies are often operator-dependent and is unpleasant for many patients. This test should be used only to answer a specific question about treatment, and certainly not to rule-out cervical pathology. EMG/NCV is useful when trying to determine the extent of peripheral nerve involvement in patients with cervical myelopathy.

No specific lab findings exist for myelopathy or radiculopathy.


Cervical spine stenosis, though often asymptomatic, is quite common in the general population and correlates with age, as degenerative changes of aging (spondylosis) is the most common cause of stenosis. An estimated 5% of the general adult population, 7% of those over 50 years of age, and 9% of those over 70 years of age have cervical stenosis.

The exact proportion of people with asymptomatic cord compression that will go on to develop symptoms is not known. A prospective study of 199 people with cord compression seen on an MRI obtained because of neck pain or radiculopathy yet who did not show signs of myelopathy found that about 25% developed myelopathy within 2 years.

Because degenerative change is often the cause of cervical myelopathy, this condition has an increasing prevalence with age. Both sexes are affected equally by cervical myelopathy, although males usually have earlier onset of symptoms (50s in men vs 60s in women). Myelopathy is responsible for approximately 4 hospitalizations per 100,000 people per year in the US.

The prevalence of cervical radiculopathy also increases with age. The incidence rate peaks between 50 to 59 years of age. Overall, the annual incidence is approximately 85 cases per 100,000 people per year in the US, with a 2:1 male to female incidence ratio.

Differential Diagnosis

When myelopathy and/or radiculopathy are suspected, the following should be considered:

  • Movement disorders: more common in the elderly. Symptoms such as tremors or, bradykinesia are clues.
  • Vitamin B12 deficiency can present with numbness, tingling, and decreased proprioception. However, motor symptoms are usually absent or mild.
  • Multiple sclerosis: can present with weakness and sensory abnormalities that are non-dermatomal. However, symptoms are most often remitting-relapsing rather than progressive as myelopathy and radiculopathy are.
  • A stroke affecting the motor and/or sensory cortex may present similarly to myelopathy or radiculopathy. However, neck pain is not a component of strokes and other neurologic deteriorations (changes in mental status, aphasia, etc.) are likely to be present in cases of stroke.
  • Peripheral nerve syndromes: Carpal tunnel syndrome (median nerve), Cubital tunnel syndrome (ulnar nerve), and other peripheral nerve compression/injury syndromes may present with dermatomal, unilateral symptoms that may be confused with radiculopathy. If physical exam findings are ambiguous, an EMG with NCS may help localize the area of nerve damage.

Red Flags

  • Any weakness or sensory symptoms after trauma to the neck. Make sure to obtain imaging to rule out fractures or instability.
  • History of cancer. There may be metastasis to the cervical spine or brain.
  • Neurological deficits beyond just extremity weakness or numbness. Must evaluate for stroke or other vascular pathologies.

Treatment Options and Outcomes

The presence of asymptomatic cervical stenosis detected incidentally on imaging is not an indication for treatment.

Patients with mild disease with little-to-no functional impairment or moderate disease with contraindications for surgery can be treated with rest, NSAIDs and muscle relaxant medication. If there is weakness, physical therapy of the neck and affected extremities are beneficial.

Patients with radiculopathy may benefit from selective nerve root corticosteroid injections.

When patients’ symptoms are severe or function markedly impaired, operative measures should be considered. The basic goal of all operative interventions is decompression of the spinal cord or the nerve root(s) and thereby preventing progression and restoring function. Multiple surgical techniques exist, including anterior decompression and fusion (Figure 9); laminectomy with posterior fusion; laminoplasty, in which a portion of the lamina is removed to enlarge the neural foramina; and prosthetic disc replacement (Figure 10).

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is indicated for persistent radicular pain that has not resolved with conservative management. This surgery is highly successful for single level disease, but with substantial multilevel disease, the surgery is more likely to fail. (The name of the operation is “fusion,” but is more accurately be termed “attempted fusion:” especially with surgery at multiple levels, not always do the bones unite as hoped.)

Figure 9: AP (right) and lateral (left) radiographs showing a plate and screws holding a cervical anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. (Case courtesy of Assoc Prof Craig Hacking, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 38120)
Figure 10: Extension and flexion radiographs showing an artificial disc with preserved segmental motion. (From https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12891-019-2509-0)

Non-operative treatment produces good outcomes in patients with mild symptoms as well as in those with larger spinal cord areas (>70mm2). Up to 75% of patients with radiculopathy will recover with just non-operative measures, as the herniated disc and associated compression/inflammation of the nerve roots may resolve over time. However, in patients with severe symptoms, non-operative treatments usually fail.

The majority of patients with radiculopathy resolve their symptoms after operative intervention (more than 90% in some studies). Many patients with myelopathy also report improvements in overall pain and symptoms with operative treatment, but the success rate is lower.

Procedures involving a fusion of three or more vertebral bodies place the cervical levels above and below the fusion at risk for accelerated degeneration. This is termed “adjacent segment disease.”

Holistic Medicine

A report from the Mayo Clinic (https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/chiropractic-adjustment/about/pac-20393513, visited 7/15/2021), suggests that chiropractic adjustments might be ill-advised for cervical spondylosis. This report claimed that “Serious complications associated with chiropractic adjustment are overall rare, but may include …a herniated disk or a worsening of an existing disk herniation…[and] a certain type of stroke after neck manipulation.” Patients were therefore advised to not seek chiropractic adjustment if they have “numbness, tingling, or loss of strength in an arm or leg” or “a known bone abnormality in the upper neck.”

Risk Factors and Prevention

The most common risk factor for cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy are age-related degenerative changes. Cervical canal stenosis, whether primary or secondary, is also an independent risk factor for developing myelopathy.

Smoking is the main modifiable risk factor for radiculopathy.

Reducing stress on the cervical spine through maintaining good posture and avoiding excessive loading can theoretically help slow the progression of the degeneration, although this is unproven.


The “Double crush hypothesis” maintains that compression of a nerve root in the cervical spine may make the distal nerve it supplies more susceptible to impairment. In particular, in the presence of cervical spondylosis or a cervical disc herniation, a patient may develop carpal tunnel syndrome from a lesser degree of median nerve compression than is ordinarily needed. The thought is that the proximal compression disrupts axonal transport along the nerve. This is intuitively appealing, but not proven. (It is likely that the hypothesis will remain unproved: proving causality would require sham-controlled, experimentally-induced nerve root compression, and that would be ethically impermissible.)

Key Terms

Spondylosis, myelopathy, radiculopathy, dermatome


Perform a comprehensive neurologic exam, including a detailed sensory exam, to determine whether symptoms are dermatomal or non-dermatomal in nature. Know the dermatome map of the cervical nerve roots. Be familiar with provocative physical exam maneuvers that may help distinguish cervical spine pathologies from isolated shoulder/arm pathologies.

Scroll to Top